Subscribe

I have moved to newlyancient.com and will be writing regularly there! Content on this domain is no longer updated, but will be maintained as an archive in its original form.

Archive for August, 2007

Investing In The Future

Time Magazine: The Genius Problem

Say you are a stock investor. You have a small stake in two companies. One company is plummeting fast into the red, while the other is coming out with innovative product after innovative product. What do you do? Do you sell your stake in the under performing company and use the money to boost the investments in the promising company? Or do you pull money out of the more promising company and simply toss more money at the under performing company, hoping to raise its performance somehow? Any intelligent investor would chose the first option. Tell that to our education system.

As I have said before, we place too much emphasis on the bottom portion of the school population, thus leaving those at the top to fend for themselves in a system designed for people much less intelligent. In a new article from Time, my unscientific assumptions have been confirmed: America is a bad investor. Instead of putting our money in the places where it will most likely create the most benefit, we dedicate ourselves on creating an Authoritative world of education, where everyone is equal. The amount of money we spend on trying to bring the slowest up to speed is staggering:

American schools spend more than $8 billion a year educating the mentally retarded. Spending on the gifted isn’t even tabulated in some states, but by the most generous calculation, we spend no more than $800 million on gifted programs. But it can’t make sense to spend 10 times as much to try to bring low-achieving students to mere proficiency as we do to nurture those with the greatest potential.

Who does this bad investing benefit? Not the geniuses for sure, who are often forced into classes far below their level. It doesn’t benefit the most handicapped either - it is the geniuses who invent ways to fight all the different ailments in our world: from mental retardation to muteness. It doesn’t even benefit the common man: the mentally retarded in most cases simply go on to depend upon welfare. Meanwhile, by turning away the most intelligent, the geniuses end up under performing and becoming isolated: almost as many suicides and drop-outs are from the top 5% as from the bottom 5%. No, the only people who benefit are the politicians who claim to be fostering equality by investing in the weak. Even that is a lie; As far as I know, equality is where everyone gets the same resources invested in them.

BusinessWeek: The Future of Work

BusinessWeek: Future of Work

Much of what we are talking about in the education debate carries over to business. The two worlds are inseparably tied. So, it should come as no surprise that BusinessWeek has a new article out about the future of work. It presents some alarmist views upon outsourcing; but also plays the positive notes of increased collaboration and connectivity in a global economy.

The rapid growth of broader, richer channels of communication—including virtual worlds—is transforming what it means to be “at work.”

Naturally, interpretation of those broader, richer channels of communication will require workers with a larger skill set an greater education:

On the positive side, employers are hiring workers with higher and higher levels of education, and jobs are demanding ever more sophistication. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 34% of adult workers in the U.S. now have a bachelor’s degree or better, up from 29% 10 years ago.

In contrast to this, the number of educated persons appears to be falling:

The wage stagnation, combined with the 60% rise in college tuitions since 2000, seems to be discouraging many young Americans from getting a college education. The percentage of 25- 29-year-olds with at least a bachelor’s degree has actually fallen during this decade.

However, I question whether this means young Americans are less optimistic of forward-thinking. Rather, it might represent a growing dissatisfaction with traditional education and an increased turn to alternative mediums (read: internet) to build the skills needed. Still, you’d think the principles of supply and demand would hold true: with a smaller pool of educated workers to draw from, jobs with degrees should have rising wages. It appears not to be so:

Even more disturbing, two decades of rising incomes for educated workers seem to have come to a halt, at least temporarily. When adjusted for inflation, the real wages and salaries of U.S. workers with at least a bachelor’s degree are barely higher than they were in 2000, an unpleasant surprise in a world in which education is seen as the route to success.

This plateauing wage is most likely the result of international competition (read: globalization) which encourages free market consulting and international entrepreneurship:

Complicating matters is the fact that the very idea of a company is shifting away from a single outfit with full-time employees and a recognizable hierarchy. It is something much more fluid, with a classic corporation at the center of an ever-shifting network of suppliers and outsourcers, some of whom only join the team for the duration of a single project.

Naturally, where a large, fluid workforce exists with communication across the globe, communication and collaboration are receiving an increased focus: especially for multinationals who must make sure employees can work effectively with their counterparts (or that overpaid consultant) across the globe:

The hard part for multinationals is getting people to work well together, especially given that day-and-night collaboration across the globe is growing…Nokia is careful to select people who have a collaborative mindset…Accenture, which spent $700 million on education last year, says its 38,000 consultants and most of its service workers take course on collaborating with offshore colleagues.

It certainly looks like the future of work is a worldwide network of employees communicating and collaborating constantly. Will education follow? Where are the collaborative projects with students in Singapore? Where are the exercises in learning a language from your peers across the globe? Where are the teachers recognizing that great teaching is a collaborative process between the teacher, the student, the student’s peers, and the world?

This post was inspired by Will.

Modern Business Meetings

Crude humor to follow. Not safe for work… (unless you workplace has meetings like this).

What if business meetings were like internet comments? College Humor has the answer:

My favorite part? The totally outdated computer CAPTCHA test.